bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

knowledgeQuestion

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Tom Holland

In case you hadn’t noticed, media commentators and industry analysts are locked in a fierce competition to come up with ever more extreme hyperboles to describe the importance of fifth generation – or 5G – mobile telecommunications technology.
Just last week, an article in the South China Morning Post told us that “5G will change the way we live forever”.
A couple of weeks earlier, Foreign Policy magazine declared that “5G will be, simply put, the central nervous system of the 21st-century economy”.
Meanwhile, a report from one UK-based financial services company hailed 5G as “a multitrillion-dollar communications revolution that will profoundly change every aspect of our lives”.
These are big claims. But there’s a problem: they betray a startling ignorance of how technological advances actually work.
China’s squeeze on Australian coal nothing to do with Huawei’s 5G ban. Really?
History, mathematics and economics all suggest that the effects of 5G will be a lot less impressive than its enthusiasts insist.
Doubtless it will find some novel and interesting uses. But those remain years away, and they will barely be apparent to most of us. Like it or not, 5G isn’t going to change the world any time soon.
Among the promises of 5G is that it can deliver fixed-line broadband levels of speed and responsiveness to vast numbers of mobile devices, no matter how densely packed. Advocates say 5G will make self-driving cars feasible for the first time, and that it will accelerate automation, allowing thousands of autonomous robots to operate on factory or warehouse floors.
But it’s hard to get excited. Truly self-driving cars will not be coming to a road near you for years, even decades. That’s not because there are insurmountable obstacles with the technology. The problems are legal.




No matter how sophisticated safety systems get, accidents will still happen. And in a litigious society, when they do happen, the liabilities faced by manufacturers and network operators will be ruinous. In short, without far-reaching changes to the law, self-driving cars are simply a non-starter.
And while 5G will have important applications in industrial automation, these will have no impact on most people.
They may not even affect many factory workers. In recent years, companies have often preferred to hire new employees rather than invest in robots. After all, with increased labour market flexibility, it is easy to lay off workers when business turns down. But investment in automation is a sunk cost. Once you’ve bought a robot, you cannot sack it if orders hit a soft patch.
Malaysia welcomes Chinese tech giant Huawei despite Western concerns
But what about all the claims that 5G will be a game-changer for ordinary mobile phone users?
No it won’t. Like other incremental technological advances, new generations of mobile phone networks are subject to diminishing marginal utility. Each time, the gains get smaller.
If you doubt that, consider another technology people said would change the world: the internet.
The development of the internet might have seemed like a revolution, but in reality it was an evolution. In a nutshell it just made communication faster.
Today, thanks to the internet, we can send, say, a 30,000 word document to someone on the other side of the world in just a few seconds.

That’s fast, but in truth it’s not all that much faster than communication speeds before the internet. Sending that 30,000 word document by fax would have taken around 16 minutes, which means the internet has sped things up by 100 times.
In this sense, the development of the electric telegraph in the mid-19th century was a much bigger deal. Before the telegraph, it took at least two weeks to send a letter across the Atlantic. The introduction of undersea cables and Morse code cut that time to just 10 minutes. That was an improvement of 2,000 times – an advance 20 greater than the internet.
K-pop stars and Huawei help South Korea win global 5G race, as Chinese trade trumps US fears
When it comes to mobile telephony, 5G will suffer from the same diminished gains. Telecom engineers say that at its best, 5G will be 100 times as fast as 4G. That might sound like a big leap, until you consider that 4G was 250 times as fast as 3G. For all the hype, the incremental gain will be less than half as great. To most ordinary users, the transition will hardly seem worthwhile.
Sure, over time, new applications that exploit 5G’s enhanced capacity should develop. Augmented reality is often mentioned.
But before that can happen, network operators will have to invest in building the necessary infrastructure.
That will not come cheap. Because 5G is intended to operate at higher frequencies than existing networks, it requires a much higher density of base stations than 4G. For optimum service, 5G will need 10 times as many base stations as 4G to cover the same area.

The capital investments needed will be enormous. China is planning to spend as much as US$50 billion a year over the next decade building 5G infrastructure. Another estimate puts the necessary investment at US$2 trillion to US$3 trillion for developed economies.
Overwhelmingly, that investment would have to be funded by debt. Globally, this would mean an increase of around 20 per cent in the amount of corporate debt outstanding, at a time when the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development is already warning that record levels of corporate debt pose a threat to financial stability and economic growth around the world.
As a result, it’s small wonder that network operators are balking at the size of the investments needed to roll out 5G. Stung by the vast cash costs of building 3G and 4G infrastructure over the last two decades, many are reluctant to make a fresh commitment, especially when the potential pay-off is so uncertain.
Thailand launches Huawei 5G test bed despite US calls on allies to ban use of Chinese gear
Surveyed last year by management consultancy Bain, a 53 per cent majority of senior executives at the world’s largest mobile network operators saw no near-term business case for investing in the technology.
All this suggests that although 5G will gain some niche industrial users, it will be many, many years before operators build out extensive mass market networks. And without those networks, there will be little incentive to develop the new applications needed to give the technology critical mass.
So, as for all those hyperbolic claims about 5G changing the way we live forever? Don’t hold your breath. ■
Tom Holland is a former SCMP staffer who has been writing about Asian affairs for more than 25 years


Hundreds of Chinese men arrested over online scams in Sri Lanka

Huawei’s Meng Wanzhou back at the helm of firm ahead of next flagship smartphone launch

Huawei heats up global smartwatch market with new GT 5 series to challenge Apple Watch

Huawei shows China’s supply chain resilience amid trade sanctions, tech decoupling fears

Forget the hype: why 5G is about to disappoint you

Photo: AFP

An array of 5G masts installed on a rooftop overlooking St. Paul's Cathedral by EE the wireless network provider, owned by BT Group Plc, during trials in the City of London, U.K., on Friday, March 15, 2019. Europe would fall behind the U.S. and China in the race to install the next generation of wireless networks if governments ban Chinese equipment supplier Huawei Technologies Co. over security fears, according to an internal assessment by Deutsche Telekom AG. Photographer: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg

Visitors use their mobiles phones as they stand next to a 5G Led Smart Bulb panel inside the Xiaomi booth at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain, February 26, 2019. REUTERS/Rafael Marchante

This Week in Asia

Opinion

Economics

News

Asia

China

Science

Business

China Business

Economy

China Economy

Tech

Comment

Frenzied media reports suggest we are on the verge of a world-changing revolution with self-driving cars and superfast mobile speeds
History, mathematics and economics suggest something far less impressive


Frenzied media reports suggest we are on the verge of a world-changing revolution with self-driving cars and superfast mobile speeds. History, mathematics and economics suggest something far less impressive.


Huawei

China economy

Internet

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

Abacus

Abacus | Forget the hype: why 5G is about to disappoint you

Frenzied media reports suggest we are on the verge of a world-changing revolution with self-driving cars and superfast mobile speeds History, mathematics and economics suggest something far less impressive

Frenzied media reports suggest we are on the verge of a world-changing revolution with self-driving cars and superfast mobile speeds

History, mathematics and economics suggest something far less impressive