Advertisement

Coronavirus: Hong Kong leader says no to probe of government’s pandemic response, so how will city learn from missteps?

  • Those who agree with chief executive say there is little to gain from a costly, drawn-out inquiry
  • But some experts say key aspects of pandemic, including city’s high death toll, deserve investigation

Reading Time:7 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
53
Illustration: Lau Ka-kuen

Hong Kong took swift action in 2003 after it emerged from the deadly severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars) outbreak that claimed 299 lives in the city.

Advertisement

It assembled a Sars Expert Committee made up of 11 medical experts from Britain, the United States, Australia, mainland China and Hong Kong to examine why the city had been hit so hard, and if there were lessons to learn.

The city had recorded 1,755 cases in three months, the second highest in the world after the mainland, and those who died included eight respected hospital staff.

The expert panel came up with 46 recommendations that helped Hong Kong stay prepared for another health crisis.

Almost two decades later, Covid-19 arrived, wreaking a toll of more than 2.8 million recorded infections, with 13,388 deaths as of Sunday.

So it seemed only natural, as infection numbers fell in recent months and Hong Kong gradually lifted its stringent pandemic restrictions, that there were calls for a similar independent probe of how the city fared during the health crisis to glean lessons for the future.

Advertisement
What was less expected, though, was Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu’s blunt response last week to suggestions for a probe: “I am against it.”
Chief Executive John Lee has dismissed calls for an inquiry into the government’s handling of the pandemic. Photo: Jelly Tse
Chief Executive John Lee has dismissed calls for an inquiry into the government’s handling of the pandemic. Photo: Jelly Tse
Advertisement